Gould Home

A website for friends and family

Woodwork in the Living Room

When I was making reference calls during the builder selection process, I talked to one couple and asked a few questions about how they interacted with the builder and they mentioned that a lot of the decisions were handled by their designer. They had a designer. We didn’t have a designer. We had an architect, a civil engineer, a mechanical engineer, a structural engineer, an arborist, a landscape designer, a builder, an EMF specialist, an electrician, etc. but no designer.

But then I realized that we did have a designer for this project, its just that I had not been paying them. Daphne has been handling the role of designer for our Sudbury River house. With some guidance from the architect, Daphne has been making all the decisions that a professional designer would handle.

So that leads me to Daphne’s latest design vision. The proposal is to add woodwork accents to the living room (and also the dining room although I do not have a picture of that). Here is Daphne’s hand drawing of the proposal, which I annotated with labels.

In this sketch, it is as if we are standing between the dining room and the living room, looking South towards the living room wall where the entertainment system will be located. The idea is to have wood slats that go up the South wall and across the ceiling, meeting somewhere over the reclining loveseat (not shown).

It should look very pretty but will also provide some level of sound dampening and maybe also break up some of the EMF standing waves that would otherwise bounce off the flat surfaces. Daphne would also like cove lighting around the outside of the living room ceiling, but we are not sure can make that work since it requires a significant drop ceiling.

If you do not know what cove lighting is, here are two pictures from the internet.

We Met With the Architect Again …

We met with the architect again and I wrote another story page about it. Check out What is a Few Inches Between Friends.

In other news, our builder is back in town and will meet with the arborist today and then meet with our architect. We have been nailing down some more design details so a packet can be put together to submit to the town so we can get a building permit.

Current schedule, which is subject to change, is to try to demolish the existing house in April or earlier if the ground is not frozen (we should have the building permit in March). Then construction is estimated to be 14-16 months. With luck, we will be moving in by the end of the summer in 2026.

An Order of Conditions Sign

As part of the Natural Resource Commission filing, we have a long list of “Order of Conditions” that we have to meet. There are 58 total different conditions (1-19 and 21-59; number 20 does not apply to this project). Most of these will be handled by the builder. But yesterday, I met condition number 10.

The architect ordered the sign from Staples, and I placed the sign next to the driveway. Fortunately, the ground was not frozen so I was able to push in the mounting frame. It is mounted just in front of the property line stake (not on the stake). We may want to move it at some point.

This is not the only signage we eventually have to display. At some point we need to post a complete copy of the Orders and Conditions in a water tight box with the DEP number on the front. We will also need to have signage on the tree protection fencing.


You can see that it has recently snowed (just an inch or two). Here are two pictures of the view of the river taken a week apart. As you can see in the later photograph, the river is now iced over, but I doubt it is safe to walk on right now.

We Have Selected a Builder

It was a somewhat stressful process that took longer than I wanted, but as of today we have officially decided that David Jenkinson of Jenkinson Homes has been selected to build our Sudbury River House. David has no web presence, so I cannot add a link. But he has been building and renovating homes in Concord for many, many years. David only works on one project at a time, so we will have his full attention until mid 2026 (fingers crossed).

The selection process started with the architect putting together a preliminary packet with all the known details of the proposed house (although not everything was known). We then asked four different builders to put together a proposal, and we gave them a month to get back to us. All four visited the site (I was there for two of the site visits), and they talked to the architect when they had questions. In mid-December, we got back all their proposals.

Our architect then merged all the proposals into one spreadsheet so we could compare the bids, line by line, as fairly as possible. Not every bid included the same breakdown, but that was cleaned up for the comparison. The bids were similar, which was expected. The material costs should be the same in all four bids and the subcontractor quotes should also be similar, so a lot of the difference in price came down to overhead (the spreadsheet approach allowed the architect to fill in missing line items, so an incomplete breakdown did not mistakenly result in a very low bid). The schedules were all reasonably close.

After we got the bids, I met with each of the builders to hear their pitch and ask questions. We held those meetings in mid-December at my current house. Following that, I asked for and followed up on some references (although did I really expect to hear bad things?). For some of the builders, there would be site supervisors and project managers and I tried to meet those people as well to get a feel for them.

The selection process was not easy. All four builders seemed great and I believe that all would be able to do a good job. My architect had some experience with all of them; and, they all seemed interested in the project. At the end of the day it came down to big versus little. The little builder (whom we ended up selected) is basically a one man shop. He is the site supervisor and the project manager. At the other end of the spectrum, two of the builders were larger firms who build multiple houses at the same time, and use a project manager and separate site supervisor for each job. I was ultimately able to meet the project managers and site supervisors who would be assigned to our project (something I wanted to do before making a selection).

I want to make it clear (since I know at least some of the builders have visited this web site), that this was a hard, agonizing decision and I would probably have been happy working with any one of builders who bid on the project. I am not going to go into more detail about why we chose David Jenkinson, but it was close and I actually had made a different choice at first, but changed my mind after sleeping on it.

Next steps:

We have a structural engineer and mechanical design firm working on details of the house. The structural engineer makes sure that the house will not fall down (which means, among other things, deciding where we may need a steel beam). The mechanical design firm deals with the heating/cooling system as well as energy recovery system and ventilation systems (e.g. kitchen and bathroom fans). Once we have the details of those designs, our architect can put together the necessary packet to give to the town so we can get a building permit. I estimate that we are two to three months from having the building permit.

Meanwhile our newly selected builder says that the removal of the stump in front of the garage (seen below) may actually damage the garage foundation so we may need to consider rebuilding the garage in place. This would require another visit to the Natural Resources Commission (which would happen in late January), but we do not expect any problems getting approval. We will start that process now.

We are also investigating what asbestos remediation the town will require before demolition. That work can proceed as soon as we know what needs to be done.

While all this is going on, Daphne continues the selection process for interior details, fixtures, lighting, doors, bathtubs, etc. We think that we have decided on the siding material and color (Nichiha Vantagewood cement siding in “poplar”), although the color we chose is brand new and may not be available for a few months. We have also chosen the roofing material and color (Enviroshake in “aged cedar”), and the trim color (matte black). We also have the window details (Marvin casement windows in “black” with natural wood trim exterior) almost ready so windows can be ordered soon. It will be a modern look house, with a Class A fire rating and materials that should not need to be replaced in our lifetimes.

Finally, I have started looking for a construction camera that will take time lapse pictures of the process. I will install that on a tree near the wetlands, looking back towards the house, before we start work.

Quick Visit to the Property

I have been visiting the property every week or so to make sure things are OK and see is anything has changed. Inside the house, I saw places where the inspector had taken samples for asbestos testing (spoiler: there is asbestos). And outside the house, a few weeks ago the arborist came by and put up yellow flags everywhere we will need to add tree protection boundaries. Here is what those flags look like.

The red stake in the background is the property boundary. These flags are on the North side of the lot, just past the driveway.

While I was there, I took a picture of our view from the main floor of the existing house. You can see some ice on the river, at the edges. I was told that the river usually freezes over, although not in the last two years. There were different sets of tracks in the snow, but I was unable to identify the animals since the snow is not very deep.

We have NRC Approval !

I just finished watching the December 11th Concord Natural Resources Commission meeting and they approved our plan with no required changes beyond what we had proposed. Woo hoo.

They mentioned a bunch of clauses (by number in the meeting) that we have to adhere to, but I assume those were all expected.

Paying for Two Trees

In 2017, Concord, MA passed a tree preservation bylaw to encourage the preservation and protection of trees on residential lots during significant demolition and/or construction activity. Since we are planning both significant demolition and construction activity, the law applies to our project.

Basically, if you take down any trees over 6″ in diameter, you either have to plant replacement trees (adding up to 1/2 of the total diameter inches removed) or pay $350 per inch into the town’s tree fund. Unfortunately, we are forced to remove a lot of trees as part of this project. But there is some good news. The tree preservation bylaw does not include the trees in the 100′ wetlands zone. The trees within 100′ of the wetlands are handled by the Concord Natural Resource Commission, and although the NRC wants to see replacement plantings, there is no corresponding pay per inch bylaw for those trees.

Here is the current plot plan showing the disposition of the trees. TBR means “to be removed”. Anything to the right of the green line is in the 100′ near-wetlands zone and is not subject to the tree preservation bylaw. (The red line is the required setback for the building from the street, which has no impact on the trees, but has a big impact on the placement of the house.) All the trees subject to the bylaw have been numbered by the arborist (T1 – T15). Four of those trees have to be removed (T3 – T6, also marked a A – D). But two of those are too small to count. That leaves us with two 18″ diameter trees for which we need to compensate the town.

The arborist is proposing planting a total of 6 replacement trees, each with a 2″ diameter. That gets us to 12 total inches. Since we do not meet the threshold of 18 total inches (one half of what is being removed), we have to pay into the town tree fund for the rest – $2,250. We can still adjust the ratio of plantings to payment, and we have not figured out where the 6 new trees would go. But it could have been a lot worse.

Also added to the plan by the arborist are yellow boundaries, which will be tree protection fences. This is different from the siltation barrier that we also have to install during construction to protect the wetlands. The siltation barrier is shown on the plot as a thick dashed line.

By the way, the plan is to cut a wide path from the road through the foliage running between the two yellow tree protection fences, and right through tree D. That will be used as the access point for all construction vehicles and heavy equipment. When construction is done, we will replant that area.

Lots of Visitors, and Lots of Waiting

The Natural Resources Commission meeting is scheduled for the evening of December 11th. We submitted our packet on November 20th, and now we wait for that meeting. Unfortunately, there seems to be five projects being discussed that evening so I do not know how late the meeting will run.

We are also waiting to hear back from the four builders to whom we submitted the design packet. All four have visited the property (although I was only there to meet with two of them). None have asked for extensions, so we expect to get their proposals on December 9th. Their details and pricing will then be collated by our architect and we will schedule meetings with each of them during the week of December 12th to select whom we will work with.

We also had an arborist visit the property to evaluate the trees that we need to remove and those we want to try to save. One tree we were hoping to save turns out to be too close to the proposed location for the new septic system so it has to come down. Tree removal is a big deal in Concord. Any trees that are not in the purview of the Natural Resources Commission are subject to a tree removal law, which means we have to replace them or pay the town based on the diameter of the tree. We will end up doing a mix of the two but I expect tens of thousand of dollars just to compensate the town for the loss of trees (welcome to the liberal Northeast).

Tomorrow we get the existing house evaluated for hazardous materials. I know that there was or is asbestos flooring, but we need an accurate assessment since it impact the demolition process. The one builder whom I talked to thought that the demolition process would only take a day, but I think that is being optimistic.

The two builders I did meet both estimated around 14 months for the build process (starting in April 2025). I am not holding my breath, but it would be nice not to have to drag out the process for years.

Finally, last weekend, we actually started the build process. Ben and I went to the property and replaced the old mailbox with a brand new one. One with a working door (the old one’s door had long since broken off). Here is a picture of the new mailbox (sorry, I obscured the house number). Fortunately, the post was still in good shape, since replacing the post would probably have been beyond my abilities.

« Older posts

© 2025 Gould Home

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑